Skip to main content

Table 2 Changes in motivation to reduce alcohol consumption and in consumption of alcohol in January and December

From: Temporal patterns of alcohol consumption and attempts to reduce alcohol intake in England

 

Motivation to reduce alcohol consumption

Model 1a

Model 2a

Model 3b

OR

95 % CI

OR

95 % CI

OR

95 % CI

Reference (other months)

1

-

1

-

1

-

 January

1.36

1.12 – 1.64

1.33

1.10–1.61

1.38

1.13–1.70

 December

  

0.85

0.69–1.05

0.85

0.68–1.05

Differential motivation sub-groups (model 3 plus interactions)

Interaction

P-valuec

 Age (6 categories)

0.76

 Sex (2 categories)

0.53

 Social class (5 categories)

0.29

 Occupation (7 categories)

0.16

 Education (9 categories)

0.85

Alcohol consumption indicators

 

OR

95 % CI

OR

95 % CI

OR

95 % CI

Any alcohol consumptiond

 reference (other months)

1

-

1

-

1

-

  January

0.95

0.88–1.04

0.94

0.86–1.02

0.92

0.84–1.01

  December

  

0.88

0.81–0.96

0.86

0.79–0.95

Average number of drinks per occasione

 reference (other months)

1

-

1

-

1

-

  January

0.97

0.88–1.06

0.97

0.89–1.07

0.94

0.85–1.04

  December

  

1.04

0.95–1.14

1.04

0.0.94–1.15

Higher risk drinkingd

 reference (other months)

1

-

1

-

1

-

  January

0.98

0.90–1.08

0.98

0.90–1.08

0.96

0.87–1.06

  December

  

1.00

0.91–1.10

0.99

0.90–1.06

Regular, at least weekly, binge drinking (>6 drinks per occasion)d

 reference (other months)

1

-

1

-

1

-

  January

0.97

0.82–1.14

0.97

0.83–1.15

0.92

0.77–1.11

  December

  

1.06

0.90–1.25

1.05

0.88–1.25

Cumulative consumptionf

 reference (other months)

1

-

1

-

1

-

  January

1.01

0.97–1.04

1.01

0.98–1.04

1.00

1.00–1.00

  December

  

1.03

0.99–1.06

1.02

0.99–1.03

  1. aalso adjusted for time to account for linear in/decreases over time
  2. badjusted for time, age, sex, social class, education and occupation
  3. cStatistically significant (P < 0.05) difference in motivation for any of the interactions was only observed for retired participants (OR = 2.78 (95 % CI 1.12–6.36))
  4. dquasibinomial regression model
  5. eordinal regression model
  6. fgeneralized linear model