|
Odds ratios (logistic)
|
---|
|
Less-than-good self-assessed health
|
Long-standing health problems
|
Smoker
|
Obesity
|
---|
1. Two-way interaction parameter estimatesa
|
England (low-edu)
|
0.76***
|
0.78***
|
0.82**
|
0.97
|
(0.064)
|
(0.065)
|
(0.073)
|
(0.097)
|
2. Three-way interaction parameter estimatesb
|
England
|
1.22
|
0.95
|
1.19
|
1.25
|
(0.197)
|
(0.125)
|
(0.182)
|
(0.213)
|
Finland
|
0.78
|
–
|
1.28
|
1.90*
|
(0.173)
|
–
|
(0.308)
|
(0.652)
|
The Netherlands
|
1.18
|
1.16
|
1.00
|
–
|
(0.221)
|
(0.181)
|
(0.165)
|
–
|
Italy
|
–
|
–
|
0.97
|
0.76*
|
–
|
–
|
(0.072)
|
(0.121)
|
3. Four-way interaction parameter estimatesc
|
England vs Finland
|
1.57
|
–
|
0.93
|
0.66
|
(0.433)
|
–
|
(0.267)
|
(0.253)
|
England vs the Netherlands
|
1.04
|
0.82
|
1.20
|
–
|
(0.257)
|
(0.167)
|
(0.270)
|
–
|
England vs Italy
|
–
|
–
|
1.23
|
1.64**
|
–
|
–
|
(0.209)
|
(0.383)
|
- Robust standard errors in parentheses. *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1
- aBased on the “two-way interaction” analysis for low-educated people in England. An odds ratio below 1.00 indicates a larger health improvement in the period 2000–2010 than in the period 1990–2000
- bBased on the “three-way interaction” analysis within each country. An odds ratio below 1.00 indicates a more favourable trend in health inequalities in the period 2000–2010 than in the period 1990–2000
- cBased on the “four-way interaction” analysis for England and each of the comparison countries. An odds ratio below 1.0 indicates a more favourable change (between 1990–2000 and 2000–2010) in the trend in health inequalities in England as compared to the other country