Skip to main content

Table 1 Differences in socio-demographics, transport behavior, perceptions, cycling skills, opinions and psychosocial determinants between the subgroups

From: Differences in environmental preferences towards cycling for transport among adults: a latent class analysis

 

Total sample

Subgroup 1

Subgroup 2

Subgroup 3

p-value

Segment Sizes (n)

n = 1950

n = 232

n = 598

n = 1120

 
 

100 %

11.9 %

30.7 %

57.4 %

 

Socio-demographic characteristics

     

 Age (yrs, M ± SD)

54.3 ± 5.6

54.7 ± 5.5

54.1 ± 5.5

54.3 ± 5.7

0.328

 Gender (% women)

56.8

47.8

60.9

56.5

0.003

 SES (% tertiary education)

64.6

68.1

65.2

63.5

0.376

 Area of residence (% village, town or rural)

59.4

54.3

56.7

62.0

0.025

 BMI (kg/m2)

25.2 ± 3.8

25.3 ± 4.2

25.2 ± 3.8

25.1 ± 3.7

0.732

 Cohabitation (%)

86.1

81.9

85.2

87.4

0.064

Transport behavior

     

 Motorized transport min/wk (M ± SD)

215.1 ± 252.2

210.9 ± 268.9

201.9 ± 227.6

223.0 ± 260.8

0.258

 Bicycle transport min/wk (M ± SD)

147.7 ± 171.1

178.8 ± 181.3b,c

135.1 ± 147.6a

148.0 ± 179.7a

0.005

 Walk for transport min/wk (M ± SD)

63.5 ± 109.4

81.9 ± 136.3b,c

63.6 ± 110.0a

59.7 ± 102.4a

0.021

 Bicycle leisure time min/wk (M ± SD)

120.3 ± 170.9

132.6 ± 174.2

114.5 ± 166.5

120.8 ± 172.5

0.397

 Number of motorized vehicles (M ± SD)

1.6 ± 1.0

1.3 ± 0.9b,c

1.6 ± 1.0a

1.6 ± 1.0a

<0.001

Psychosocial determinants (5-point scale) (M ± SD)

    

 Habit (1 item)

3.4 ± 1.5

3.7 ± 1.5b,c

3.3 ± 1.5a

3.3 ± 1.5a

0.009

 Social norm (4 items, α = 0.90)

2.9 ± 1.2

3.0 ± 1.3

2.9 ± 1.2

2.8 ± 1.1

0.178

 Modeling (4 items, α = 0.55)

3.2 ± 0.8

3.3 ± 0.8c

3.2 ± 0.8

3.1 ± 0.8a

0.046

 Social support (4 items, α = 0.81)

2.4 ± 1.0

2.6 ± 1.0

2.4 ± 1.0

2.4 ± 0.9

0.184

 Self-efficacy (11 items, α = 0.92)

3.7 ± 0.9

3.9 ± 0.9b,c

3.7 ± 0.9a

3.7 ± 0.9a

0.006

 Perceived benefits (10 items, α = 0.84)

4.0 ± 0.6

4.1 ± 0.6b,c

4.0 ± 0.6a

4.0 ± 0.6a

0.008

 Perceived barriers (16 items, α = 0.90)

2.4 ± 0.7

2.3 ± 0.7b,c

2.4 ± 0.7a

2.4 ± 0.7a

0.014

Perceived neighborhood environment (5-point scale) (M ± SD)

    

 Amount of single unit houses

3.0 ± 1.5

2.7 ± 1.5b,c

3.0 ± 1.5a

3.0 ± 1.4a

0.003

 Presence of shops in the neighborhood

3.3 ± 1.4

3.4 ± 1.3

3.2 ± 1.4

3.3 ± 1.3

0.168

 Presence of a stop for public transport

4.3 ± 1.0

4.4 ± 1.0

4.3 ± 1.0

4.3 ± 1.0

0.464

 Presence of recreational opportunities (park, pool)

3.3 ± 1.4

3.5 ± 1.4

3.3 ± 1.4

3.3 ± 1.4

0.134

 Neighborhood traffic safety

3.2 ± 1.1

3.3 ± 1.1

3.1 ± 1.1

3.2 ± 1.1

0.168

 Neighborhood safety of crime

2.2 ± 1.0

2.1 ± 1.0

2.1 ± 1.0

2.2 ± 1.0

0.391

 Sufficient cycling infrastructure

3.1 ± 1.1

3.0 ± 1.1

3.1 ± 1.1

3.1 ± 1.1

0.551

 Neighborhood social environment

3.4 ± 1.0

3.4 ± 1.0

3.4 ± 1.0

3.4 ± 1.0

0.559

 Good maintenance of cycling infrastructure

2.9 ± 1.1

2.8 ± 1.1

2.9 ± 1.1

2.9 ± 1.1

0.415

 Presence of vegetation

3.1 ± 1.1

3.1 ± 1.1

3.1 ± 1.1

3.1 ± 1.1

0.939

Cycling skills (5-point scale) (M ± SD)

4.1 ± 0.7

4.1 ± 0.8

4.1 ± 0.7

4.1 ± 0.7

0.963

Cycling concerns (5-point scale) (M ± SD)

    

 As a cyclist I feel vulnerable in the traffic

3.7 ± 0.9

3.9 ± 0.9b

3.7 ± 1.0a,c

3.7 ± 0.9b

0.007

 Importance of a fluorescent vest or bicycle helmet

4.9 ± 1.8

4.9 ± 1.8

4.7 ± 1.8c

5.0 ± 1.8b

0.001

Cycling preferences (5-point scale) (M ± SD)

    

 I prefer the safest cycling route

3.8 ± 0.9

3.9 ± 1.0b

3.7 ± 0.9a,c

3.9 ± 0.9b

0.002

 I prefer the shortest cycling route

3.2 ± 1.0

3.2 ± 1.0

3.2 ± 1.0

3.2 ± 0.9

0.670

 I prefer the most beautiful cycling route

3.6 ± 0.9

3.6 ± 0.9

3.6 ± 0.9

3.6 ± 0.9

0.215

 I prefer to cycle alone

3.6 ± 1.0

3.7 ± 1.0c

3.7 ± 1.0c

3.5 ± 1.1a,b

0.003

  1. asignficiant difference with subgroup 1
  2. bsignificant difference with subgroup 2
  3. csignificant difference with subgroup 3