Skip to main content

Table 4 Intercept survey results of food outlet customers categorized according to intervention

From: The Effect of Energy Labelling on Menus and a Social Marketing Campaign on Food-Purchasing Behaviours of University Students

Percentage of students (%)

Menu labelling (n = 318) (%)

Mean (SD) energy consumed (kJ)

Social marketing campaign (n = 264) (%)

Mean (SD) energy consumed (kJ)

Chi squarea

Significancea

Aware of kJ intervention

30

3353 (732)

51

3811 (1272)b

13.82

0.0015

Aware but not influenced by intervention

25

3392 (871)

42

3968 (1382)c

9.25

0.0005

Aware and influenced by intervention

5

3313 (966)

9

2833 (1182)b, c

5.99

0.0604

  1. aChi-squared tests for differences in proportions of awareness and influence of intervention
  2. ANOVA with Bon-ferroni post-hoc test
  3. bReported mean kJ consumed between respondents who recalled campaign and used labels and respondents who did not recall campaign: p-value < 0.01, 99 % 978 kJ CI (129.7, 1721.6)
  4. cReported mean kJ consumed between respondents who recalled campaign elements but differed in reported label use p-value < 0.01, 99 % 1135 kJ CI (126.9, 1796.2)