Skip to main content

Table 3 Fairness perceptions about the claims process, claims management, medical assessments, lawyer involvement, and dispute process

From: Differences in perceived fairness and health outcomes in two injury compensation systems: a comparative study

Claims process

NSWa

VICa

χ2

P

It is easy to fill out forms

45/97 (46 %)

62/80 (78 %)

17.75

< .001

It is easy to support claim

50/97 (52 %)

70/82 (85 %)

23.00

< .001

Claim duration is acceptable

44/96 (46 %)

70/84 (83 %)

27.13

< .001

Compensation received so far is fair

45/98 (46 %)

60/81 (74 %)

14.50

< .001

Overall claim process is fair

44/96 (46 %)

70/83 (84 %)

28.54

< .001

Claims management

The claims manager…

 takes views/feelings into account

39/96 (39 %)

62/82 (76 %)

22.05

< .001

 manages claim objectively

41/96 (42 %)

78/84 (93 %)

50.29

< .001

 uses correct information

43/96 (45 %)

75/82 (92 %)

43.11

< .001

 provides information

44/96 (46 %)

71/83 (86 %)

30.56

< .001

 explains procedure

33/96 (34 %)

64/79 (81 %)

38.15

< .001

 communicates timely

39/95 (41 %)

66/84 (79 %)

25.88

< .001

 is polite

66/96 (67 %)

78/82 (95 %)

19.90

< .001

 is respectful

63/96 (64 %)

78/84 (93 %)

19.58

< .001

 approves treatment needed

56/98 (57 %)

76/82 (93 %)

28.84

< .001

 approves treatment promptly

51/98 (52 %)

68/82 (83 %)

19.01

< .001

 approves other services promptly

37/98 (37 %)

49/73 (67 %)

14.43

< .001

Medical assessments

The medical assessor…

 provided information

26/52 (50 %)

3/8 (38 %)

-

-

 explained procedure

27/52 (52 %)

5/8 (63 %)

-

-

 examined unbiased

21/52 (40 %)

3/8 (38 %)

-

-

 was polite

35/52 (67 %)

6/8 (75 %)

-

-

 was respectful

35/52 (67 %)

5/8 (63 %)

-

-

Number of assessments was acceptable

34/53 (64 %)

7/8 (88 %)

-

-

Lawyer involvement

The lawyer…

 provided information

57/66 (86 %)

8/10 (80 %)

-

-

 explained procedure

57/66 (86 %)

8/10 (80 %)

-

-

 communicated timely

55/66 (83 %)

8/10 (90 %)

-

-

 was polite

64/66 (97 %)

11/11 (100 %)

-

-

 was respectful

61/66 (92 %)

11/11 (100 %)

-

-

The lawyer made the process easier

56/66 (85 %)

8/11 (73 %)

-

-

Dispute process

Decision maker …

 provided information

0/2 (0 %)

1/1 (100 %)

-

-

 explained procedure

0/2 (0 %)

1/1 (100 %)

-

-

 communicated judgment

0/2 (0 %)

1/1 (100 %)

-

-

 was polite

2/2 (100 %)

1/1 (100 %)

-

-

 was respectful

2/2 (100 %)

1/1 (100 %)

-

-

Dispute process was stressful

2/2 (100 %)

1/1 (100 %)

-

-

  1. Notes. The answer scale to all justice questions was strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, strongly disagree, which was dichotomised into strongly disagree, disagree, neither agree nor disagree versus agree, strongly agree
  2. acolumn displays the number of participants that strongly agreed/agreed with the statement divided by the total number of participants that answered the question
  3. - = The number of participants is too small to conduct further analyses