Skip to main content

Table 5 Child outcomes by caregiver implementation at 6 months (n = 231)a

From: Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention

 

Number

BMI (kg/m2)

 

zBMI

 

SSB (min/day)

 

TSB (min/day)

 
  

Model-adjusted mean (95 % CI)

P value*

Model-adjusted mean (95 % CI)

P value*

Model-adjusted mean (95 % CI)

P value*

Model-adjusted mean (95 % CI)

P value*

Implementation

 Often/always

30

26.79 (26.32 to 27.26)

0.37

2.60 (2.51 to 2.69)

0.33

200 (145 to 255)

0.43

541 (491 to 591)

0.81

 Sometimes

25

27.09 (26.58 to 27.60)

0.06

2.64 (2.54 to 2.74)

0.11

219 (159 to 280)

0.88

544 (490 to 599)

0.73

 Rarely

25

26.32 (25.81 to 26.83)

0.40

2.47 (2.37 to 2.57)

0.16

204 (142 to 266)

0.55

508 (451 to 564)

0.40

 Never

151

26.56 (26.34 to 26.77)

ref

2.55 (2.51 to 2.59)

ref

225 (199 to 251)

ref

534 (510 to 558)

ref

  1. BMI body mass index, CI confidence interval, kg kilograms, m metres, min minutes, ref reference group, SSB screen-based sedentary behaviour, TSB total sedentary behaviour, zBMI body mass index z-score
  2. *P value indicates statistical significance in mean difference between the current and reference level of caregiver implementation
  3. aTwenty intervention primary caregivers did not provide information on implementation. Regression analysis controlled for baseline outcome value, age, sex and ethnicity