Skip to main content

Table 5 Child outcomes by caregiver implementation at 6 months (n = 231)a

From: Screen Time Weight-loss Intervention Targeting Children at Home (SWITCH): process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial intervention

  Number BMI (kg/m2)   zBMI   SSB (min/day)   TSB (min/day)  
   Model-adjusted mean (95 % CI) P value* Model-adjusted mean (95 % CI) P value* Model-adjusted mean (95 % CI) P value* Model-adjusted mean (95 % CI) P value*
Implementation
 Often/always 30 26.79 (26.32 to 27.26) 0.37 2.60 (2.51 to 2.69) 0.33 200 (145 to 255) 0.43 541 (491 to 591) 0.81
 Sometimes 25 27.09 (26.58 to 27.60) 0.06 2.64 (2.54 to 2.74) 0.11 219 (159 to 280) 0.88 544 (490 to 599) 0.73
 Rarely 25 26.32 (25.81 to 26.83) 0.40 2.47 (2.37 to 2.57) 0.16 204 (142 to 266) 0.55 508 (451 to 564) 0.40
 Never 151 26.56 (26.34 to 26.77) ref 2.55 (2.51 to 2.59) ref 225 (199 to 251) ref 534 (510 to 558) ref
  1. BMI body mass index, CI confidence interval, kg kilograms, m metres, min minutes, ref reference group, SSB screen-based sedentary behaviour, TSB total sedentary behaviour, zBMI body mass index z-score
  2. *P value indicates statistical significance in mean difference between the current and reference level of caregiver implementation
  3. aTwenty intervention primary caregivers did not provide information on implementation. Regression analysis controlled for baseline outcome value, age, sex and ethnicity