Skip to main content

Table 2 Estimates of effect on IPV, comparing outcome in intervention versus control communities

From: Ecological pathways to prevention: How does the SASA! community mobilisation model work to prevent physical intimate partner violence against women?

  Baseline Follow-up  
IPV outcome indicators Intervention Control Intervention Control aRRa (95 % CI)
  n/N (%) n/N (%) n/N (%) n/N (%)  
Women’s past year experience of physical IPV (among those partnered in past year) 75/302 (25 %) 57/273 (21 %) 46/504 (9 %) 93/424 (22 %) 0.48 (0.16 to 1.39)
Men’s past year perpetration of IPV (among those partnered in past year) 95/309 (31 %) 101/326 (31 %) 123/617 (20 %) 256/523 (49 %) 0.39 (0.20–0.73)
  1. aRisk ratios calculated at the cluster-level, adjusted for community-pair, and weighted according to the number of observations per village. Adjusted risk ratios generated on the basis of expected number of events from a logistic regression model on individual data with independent variables including age, marital status and EA-level summary baseline measure of IPV