Ecological pathways to prevention: How does the SASA! community mobilisation model work to prevent physical intimate partner violence against women?

Table 2 Estimates of effect on IPV, comparing outcome in intervention versus control communities

	Baseline		Follow-up
IPV outcome indicators	Intervention	Control	Intervention	Control	aRR^a (95 % CI)
	n/N (%)	n/N (%)	n/N (%)	n/N (%)
Women’s past year experience of physical IPV (among those partnered in past year)	75/302 (25 %)	57/273 (21 %)	46/504 (9 %)	93/424 (22 %)	0.48 (0.16 to 1.39)
Men’s past year perpetration of IPV (among those partnered in past year)	95/309 (31 %)	101/326 (31 %)	123/617 (20 %)	256/523 (49 %)	0.39 (0.20–0.73)

^aRisk ratios calculated at the cluster-level, adjusted for community-pair, and weighted according to the number of observations per village. Adjusted risk ratios generated on the basis of expected number of events from a logistic regression model on individual data with independent variables including age, marital status and EA-level summary baseline measure of IPV

ISSN: 1471-2458