Skip to main content

Table 5 Relationships between LUCIE and the SMBQ, UWES, JCQ and BFI scores

From: The Lund University Checklist for Incipient Exhaustion–a cross–sectional comparison of a new instrument with similar contemporary tools

 

LUCIE

Step 1 GG

Step 2 YG

Step 3 RG

1Step 4 RR

Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA

(n = 881)

(N = 282)

(N = 117)

(N = 67)

Mdn

(10 − 90)

Mdn

(10 − 90)

Mdn

(10 − 90)

Mdn

(10 − 90)

P-value

SMBQ

         

Global-22

2.1a

(1.4 − 3.3)

3.3b

(2.2 − 4.5)

4.0c

(3.0 − 4.9)

4.6c

(3.1 − 5.7)

<0.001

Global-18

2.0a

(1.3 − 3.3)

3.2b

(2.1 − 4.5)

4.0c

(2.9 − 5.1)

4.6c

(2.9 − 5.8)

<0.001

Cognitive weariness

1.8a

(1.0 − 3.5)

2.8b

(1.5 − 4.8)

3.7c

(2.0 − 5.3)

4.7c

(2.5 − 6.7)

<0.001

Listlessness

2.5a

(1.5 − 4.0)

3.5b

(2.3 − 5.0)

4.3c

(3.0 − 5.3)

4.5c

(3.0 − 6.0)

<0.001

Physical exhaustion

2.0a

(1.3 − 3.4)

3.3b

(2.0 − 4.5)

4.0c

(2.9 − 5.4)

4.8c

(3.1 − 6.0)

<0.001

Tension

2.3a

(1.3 − 3.8)

3.3b

(2.0 − 5.0)

4.0c

(2.8 − 5.0)

4.5c

(3.0 − 6.0)

<0.001

UWES

         

UWES Total

4.6a

(3.2 − 5.4)

4.2b

(2.8 − 5.2)

4.0c

(2.4 − 5.2)

3.7c

(2.0 − 5.0)

<0.001

Absorption

4.3a

(2.7 − 5.7)

4.3acd

(2.7 − 5.3)

4.0b ,c

(2.0 − 5.3)

4.0b ,d

(2.0 − 5.3)

0.003

Dedication

4.7a

(3.3 − 6.0)

4.3b

(3.0 − 5.5)

4.0c

(2.7 − 5.7)

3.7c

(1.7 − 5.3)

<0.001

Vigor

4.7a

(3.0 − 5.3)

4.0b

(2.7 − 5.0)

3.7c

(2.0 − 5.0)

3.3c

(1.3 − 5.0)

<0.001

JCQ

         

Job Control, total

3.3a

(2.8 − 3.8)

3.3b

(2.7 − 3.8)

3.2b

(2.5 − 3.8)

3.2b

(2.4 − 3.8)

0.002

-Decision latitude

3.3a

(2.7 − 4.0)

3.3b

(2.3 − 4.0)

3.0b

(2.3 − 3.7)

3.0b

(2.0 − 3.7)

<0.001

-Skill discretion

3.3

(2.8 − 3.8)

3.3

(2.7 − 3.8)

3.3

(2.7 − 3.8)

3.5

(2.5 − 3.8)

0.393

Job Demands

2.7a

(2.1 − 3.1)

2.9b

(2.3 − 3.4)

3.0c

(2.6 − 3.7)

3.3c

(2.6 − 3.8)

<0.001

Job Support, total

3.0a

(2.6 − 3.5)

2.9b

(2.3 − 3.4)

2.8c

(2.1 − 3.3)

2.7c

(1.6 − 3.3)

<0.001

-Sup. Colleagues

3.0a

(2.8 − 3.8)

3.0b

(2.5 − 3.8)

3.0c

(2.5 − 3.5)

3.0c

(2.0 − 3.8)

<0.001

-Sup. Manager

3.0a

(2.3 − 3.5)

2.7b

(1.8 − 3.3)

2.5c

(1.5 − 3.5)

2.3c

(1.0 − 3.3)

<0.001

BFI

         

Neuroticism

2.3a

(1.5 − 3.0)

2.5b

(1.8 − 3.4)

2.9c

(2.0 − 3.6)

2.9c

(2.1 − 3.9)

<0.001

Extraversion

3.8a

(2.8 − 4.5)

3.5b

(2.6 − 4.5)

3.5b

(2.8 − 4.3)

3.4a ,b

(2.5 − 4.6)

0.019

Openness

3.3a

(2.6 − 4.2)

3.4b

(2.6 − 4.3)

3.3a ,b

(2.7 − 4.1)

3.7c

(2.9 − 4.5)

0.001

Agreeableness

4.0a

(3.4 − 4.6)

3.9b

(3.2 − 4.4)

3.8b

(3.2 − 4.4)

4.0a ,b

(3.1 − 4.4)

<0.001

Conscientiousness

4.0a

(3.3 − 4.6)

3.9b

(3.3 − 4.6)

3.9b

(3.1 − 4.6)

4.0a ,b

(3.1 − 4.7)

<0.001

  1. Note: Values in the same row and subtable not sharing the same subscript are significantly different at p < 0.05 in pairwise comparison
  2. 1The rare combination of SWS yellow + UWS red (n = 4) was included in this category
  3. SMBQ shirom-melamed burnout questionnaire, UWES utrecht work engagement scale, JCQ job content questionnaire, BFI big five inventory
  4. Data represent the median (Mdn) and the 10th and 90th percentile (10 − 90)