The Lund University Checklist for Incipient Exhaustion–a cross–sectional comparison of a new instrument with similar contemporary tools

Table 2 Distribution of men and women across the different exhaustion measures

	Age		Total		Women		Men		Chi-square test
	Age		(n = 1355)		(n = 779)		(n = 576)		Chi-square test
	Mean	SD	N	%	N	%	N	%	P-value
LUCIE									0.264
Step 1-GG (n = 881)	41	7	881	65	495_a	64	386_a	67
Step 2-YG (n = 282)	40	7	282	21	163_a	21	119_a	21
Step 3-RG (n = 117)	41	7	117	9	72_a	9	45_a	8
¹Step 4-RR (n = 67)	41	7	67	5	45_a	6	22_a	4
KEDS									0.001
Normal (n = 1168)	41	7	1168	87	651_a	84	517_b	90
Exhaustion (n = 179)	40*	7	179	13	123_a	16	56_b	10
s-ED									0.002
No (n = 1250)	41	7	1250	92	702_a	90	548_b	95
Mild (n = 71)	42	7	71	5	54_a	7	17_b	3
Pronounced (n = 34)	40	7	34	3	23_a	3	11_a	2

Note: Values in the same row and subtable not sharing the same subscript are significantly different at p < 0.05 in the two-tailed test of equality for column proportions
*Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.05
¹The rare combination of SWS yellow + UWS red (n = 4) was included in this category

ISSN: 1471-2458