Table 2 Observational studies assessing adherence to and acceptability of home fortification with multiple micronutrients in powder (MNP) in complementary feeding
Source study (n = 3) | Site | Prevalence of nutritional disorders | Study aim | Study design | Sample at baseline | Intervention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Espino et al. (2012) [8] | Apurímac, Peru | Anaemia = 64.0 %. | To evaluate the implementation of the program of universal supplementation with MNP “chispitas” through the quantity and quality of sachets consumed and its relation to anaemia. | Cluster-randomized trial. One group: supplemented with MNP | n = 714 children, aged 6 to 35 months. | Frequency: at least 15 sachets monthly Intervention duration: 6 months Total sachets prescribed: 90 Iron dosage in MNP: 12.5 mg |
Bilukha et al. (2011) [14] | Butan | Stunting = 39.2 %; anemia = 43.3 %. | To evaluate the effectiveness of a program to distribute MNP on a large scale in reducing the prevalence of anaemia and monitoring morbidity and growth in refugee children. | Longitudinal cluster-randomized trial. One group: supplemented with MNP (no control group). | n = 502 children, aged 6 to 59 months. | Frequency: 15 sachets monthly Intervention duration: 26 months Total sachets prescribed: 390 Iron dosage in MNP: 10 mg |
Jefferds et al. (2010) [22] | Kenya | No data given. | To describe community members’ reactions to and experiences using MNP, with an emphasis on acceptability, utilization, and promotion. | Qualitative study. | n = 47 children, aged 6 to 59 months. | Frequency: daily Intervention duration: 1 month Total sachets prescribed: 30 Iron dosage in MNP: 12.5 mg |