Intimate partner violence norms cluster within households: an observational social network study in rural Honduras

Table 4 Association between network characteristics and the likelihood that an individual accepts IPV

	Ego degree centrality	Alter IPV* Alter degree centrality
Ego Highly connected	−0.55^**
	(0.21)
Alter Support IPV		0.90
		(0.14)^****
Alter highly connected		−0.05
		(0.10)
Alter Support IPV* Alter highly connected		−0.55^***
		(0.20)
Gender male	−0.59^***	−0.54^**
	(0.20)	(0.20)
Income	−0.34^***	−0.33^***
	(0.13)	(0.13)
Age in years	0.02^**	0.01
	(0.01)	(0.01)
Education	−0.04	−0.04
	(0.15)	(0.15)
Religion Ref = Catholic
Evangelical	−0.32	−0.24
	(0.26)	(0.25)
None	−0.03	0.05
	(0.39)	(0.38)
Marital Ref = Married
Single	0.42	0.45
	(0.32)	(0.32)
Civil Union	0.24	0.29
	(0.25)	(0.25)
Separate or Divorce	0.09	0.20
	(0.43)	(0.44)
Village	0.40	0.31
	(0.19)	(0.20)
Num. obs.	9621	9621
Num. clust.	832	832

Multiple observations of the same individual adjusted for using GEE. Results of regressions of dependent variable equal to 1 if the subject accepted IPV, 0 otherwise and standard errors reported in parentheses
^**** p < 0.001, ^*** p < 0.01, ^** p < 0.05, ^* p < 0.10

ISSN: 1471-2458