Skip to main content

Table 1 SASA! cluster randomised controlled trial outcomes

From: Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of a community mobilisation intervention to reduce intimate partner violence in Kampala, Uganda

 

Intervention

Control

Unadjusted risk differencea(90 % CI)

Adjusted risk differenceb (90 % CI)

Reduced social acceptance of gender inequality and IPV

Acceptability of physical violence by a man against his partner

 • Male attitudes

136/768 (18 %)±

544/634 (86 %)±

−68.2 (−88.0–-48.3)

−68.6 (−87.0–-50.3)

 • Female attitudes

191/599 (32 %)±

311/528 (59 %)±

−27.5 (−42.6–-12.4)

−27.7 (−42.7–-12.6)

Acceptability that a woman can refuse sex

 • Male attitudes

744/768 (97 %)±

474/634 (75 %)±

22.3 (6.4–38.2)

21.9 (7.9–36.0)

 • Female attitudes

542/599 (90 %)±

385/529 (73 %)±

18.1 (8.5–27.7)

19.0 (10.2–27.8)

Decrease in women’s experience of IPV

Past year physical IPV

46/504 (9 %)

93/424 (22 %)

−12.8 (−24.6–-0.9)

−11.6 (−22.3–-0.9)

Past year sexual IPV

70/504 (14 %)

84/423 (20 %)

−5.9 (−15.8–4.0)

−6.0 (−15.9–3.9)

Improved response to women experiencing IPV

Appropriate community response to women experiencing IPV in past year

28/102 (27 %)

18/139 (13 %)

14.0 (−6.0–33.9)

15.2 (−4.7–35.1)

Decrease in sexual risk behaviours

Past year concurrent sexual partners among non-polygamous men partnered in past year

139/508 (27 %)

177/397 (45 %)

−17.3 (−28.1–-6.5)

−19.9 (−28.7–-11.0)

  1. aRisk differences calculated at the cluster-level, all (crude and adjusted) adjusted for community-pair, and weighted according to the number of observations per village
  2. bAdjusted risk differences generated on the basis of expected number of events from a logistic regression model on individual data with independent variables including age, marital status and EA-level summary baseline measure of outcome indicator
  3. ±Baseline measure controlled for: disclosed past year IPV and got helpful response