Skip to main content

Table 3 Sociodemographic correlations of traditional bullying victimization and cyber-teasing of study sample

From: Prevalence and patterns of traditional bullying victimization and cyber-teasing among college population in Spain

Variables Cyber-teasing victim only Traditional bullying victimization only Cyber-teasing and traditional bullying victimization Neither
  No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%)
Gender     
Girl 61 (15.0)*** 79 (19.5)* 160 (39.5) 105 (25.9)
Boy 4 (2.8) 37 (26.8) 61 (44.2) 36 (26.0)
Nationality     
Spanish 61 (12.2) 111 (22.2)** 200 (40.0) 127 (25.4)
Non-Spanish 4 (9.0) 5 (11.3) 21 (47.7) 14 (31.8)
Grade     
 2° 29 (14.8) 40 (20.5) 85 (43.5) 195 (21.1)
 3° 25 (17.3) 26 (18.0) 59 (40.9) 34 (23.6)
 4° 2 (2.4) 20 (13.8) 33 (40.2) 27 (32.9)
 5° 5 (8.6) 16 (27.5) 24 (41.3) 13 (7.5)
 6° 4 (6.2) 14 (21.8) 20 (31.2) 26 (40.6)
Economic problems     
 Yes 35 (19.1)** 28 (15.3)** 80 (43.7) 40 (21.8)
 No 30 (8.3) 88 (24.4) 141 (39.1) 101 (28)
Family conflicts     
 Yes 61 (21.3)*** 70 (20.7) 51 (49.0)* 26 (25.0)
 No 43 (16.7) 34 (32.6) 170 (38.7) 116 (26.4)
Alcohol use     
 Yes 52 (11.8) 101 (23.0)* 179 (40.8) 106 (24.2)
 No 13 (12.3) 15 (14.2) 42 (40.0) 35 (33.3)
Cannabis use     
 Yes 10 (11.3) 24 (27.2) 30 (34.0) 24 (27.2)
 No 55 (12.0) 92 (20.1) 191 (41.9) 117 (25.7)
  1. Statistically significant difference between victims and non-victims; *p ≤ .05, **P ≤ .01, ***P ≤ .001