Skip to main content

Table 3 Sociodemographic correlations of traditional bullying victimization and cyber-teasing of study sample

From: Prevalence and patterns of traditional bullying victimization and cyber-teasing among college population in Spain

Variables

Cyber-teasing victim only

Traditional bullying victimization only

Cyber-teasing and traditional bullying victimization

Neither

 

No. (%)

No. (%)

No. (%)

No. (%)

Gender

    

Girl

61 (15.0)***

79 (19.5)*

160 (39.5)

105 (25.9)

Boy

4 (2.8)

37 (26.8)

61 (44.2)

36 (26.0)

Nationality

    

Spanish

61 (12.2)

111 (22.2)**

200 (40.0)

127 (25.4)

Non-Spanish

4 (9.0)

5 (11.3)

21 (47.7)

14 (31.8)

Grade

    

 2°

29 (14.8)

40 (20.5)

85 (43.5)

195 (21.1)

 3°

25 (17.3)

26 (18.0)

59 (40.9)

34 (23.6)

 4°

2 (2.4)

20 (13.8)

33 (40.2)

27 (32.9)

 5°

5 (8.6)

16 (27.5)

24 (41.3)

13 (7.5)

 6°

4 (6.2)

14 (21.8)

20 (31.2)

26 (40.6)

Economic problems

    

 Yes

35 (19.1)**

28 (15.3)**

80 (43.7)

40 (21.8)

 No

30 (8.3)

88 (24.4)

141 (39.1)

101 (28)

Family conflicts

    

 Yes

61 (21.3)***

70 (20.7)

51 (49.0)*

26 (25.0)

 No

43 (16.7)

34 (32.6)

170 (38.7)

116 (26.4)

Alcohol use

    

 Yes

52 (11.8)

101 (23.0)*

179 (40.8)

106 (24.2)

 No

13 (12.3)

15 (14.2)

42 (40.0)

35 (33.3)

Cannabis use

    

 Yes

10 (11.3)

24 (27.2)

30 (34.0)

24 (27.2)

 No

55 (12.0)

92 (20.1)

191 (41.9)

117 (25.7)

  1. Statistically significant difference between victims and non-victims; *p ≤ .05, **P ≤ .01, ***P ≤ .001