Skip to main content

Table 4 Lead nurses versus non-lead nurses’ attitudes regarding syndromic surveillance

From: Missouri K-12 school collection and reporting of school-based syndromic surveillance data: a cross sectional study

Statement

All Nurses

Lead nurse vs. Not lead nurse

 

N = 133

N = 133

  

Not lead nurse N = 78

Lead nurse N = 55

Lead nurse vs. not lead nurse

 

Strongly agreed or agreed % (n)

Strongly agreed or agreed % (n)

Strongly agreed or agreed % (n)

p valuea

School syndromic surveillance data collection is important

79.7 (106)

80.8 (63)

78.2 (43)

NS

School syndromic surveillance data can aid in rapid identification of a biological event

75.9 (101)

75.6 (59)

76.4 (42)

NS

I have time to collect syndromic surveillance data

69.9 (93)

76.9 (60)

60.0 (33)

< .05

My school has the resources needed to collect syndromic surveillance data

58.6 (78)

67.9 (53)

45.5 (25)

< .01

I know how to collect syndromic surveillance data for my school

51.1 (68)

50.0 (39)

52.7 (29)

NS

Our local health department is interested in collecting school syndromic surveillance data

45.1 (60)

47.4 (37)

41.8 (23)

NS

My school administrators support syndromic surveillance data collection

35.3 (47)

35.9 (28)

34.5 (19)

NS

I know how to analyze syndromic surveillance data

29.3 (39)

24.4 (19)

36.4 (20)

NS

  1. NS Non-significant
  2. aDetermined by the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test (when cell size ≤ 5)