Skip to main content

Table 2 Sensitivity analysis parameters and results

From: Using a computational model to quantify the potential impact of changing the placement of healthy beverages in stores as an intervention to “Nudge” adolescent behavior choice

Variable

Probability

Relative probability of purchase in the optimal location compared to the worst locationa

Convenience shopper

18.3 (half)

1.97

65.2 (double)

5.01

Always SSB

25

3.50

Horizontal and Vertical effects

Vertical (double)

Horizontal (double)

3.47

Shelf 1 (top)

17.4

Cooler 1

19.2

Shelf 2

17.8

Cooler 2

18.2

Shelf 3

17.6

Cooler 3

17.2

Shelf 4

17.0

Cooler 4

16.2

Shelf 5

16.0

Cooler 5

15.2

Shelf 6

14.4

Cooler 6 (back)

14.2

Vertical (half)

Horizontal (half)

2.51

Shelf 1 (top)

17.1

Cooler 1

17.3

Shelf 2

16.9

Cooler 2

17.0

Shelf 3

16.9

Cooler 3

16.8

Shelf 4

16.7

Cooler 4

16.5

Shelf 5

16.5

Cooler 5

16.3

Shelf 6

16.1

Cooler 6 (back)

16.0

  1. Note: aOptimal location: cooler 1, shelf 2 or 3; relative to worst location: cooler 6, shelf 6