Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Odds ratios from PLUM-ordinal regressions relating IMHS at 43 and exposure to open unemployment or youth programs at 18–21

From: Do open youth unemployment and youth programs leave the same mental health scars? - Evidence from a Swedish 27-year cohort study

  Model 1 Model2 Model 3 Model 4a
  OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI
Open unemployment 18–21 (no exp. ref.)         
Yes 1.99*** 1.43–2.74    1.77*** 1.26–2.48 1.71** 1.20–2.43
Youth programs 18–21 (no exp. ref.)         
Yes    1.41** 1.13–1.65 1.30* 1.01–1.66 1.23 0.93–1.63
IMHS at age 16 1.32*** 1.23–1.43 1.32*** 1.23–1.43 1.32*** 1.23–1.43 1.26*** 1.15–1.38
Pseudo R-square         
Cox and Snell 0.06   0.05   0.06   0.09  
Nagelkerke 0.06   0.06   0.07   0.09  
  1. a Covariates added in model 4: Gender, long-term somatic health problems at 16, truancy at 16, parental social class at 16, parental employment at 16, living with both parents at 16, paternal health problems at 16
  2. *** = p < 0.001. ** = p < 0.01. * = 0.05, OR = Odds Ratio, 95 % CI = 95 % Confidence Interval