From: Eradicating female genital mutilation and cutting in Tanzania: an observational study
Project Outcomes | KAP Variables | HHS Baseline n = 1013 | HHS Endline n = 1139 | P Value | PRRa | CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Community empowerment | Those who knew FGM effects | 54 % (536) | 72 %(822) | <0.001 | 1.333 | 1.50–2.30 |
Those in favour of FGM eradicated | 62 % (627) | 74.4 %(847) | <0.001 | 1.170 | 1.10–1.240 | |
Those who had participated in anti FGM campaign activities | 23.2 % (235) | 24.1 % (274) | 0.6402 | 1.037 | 0.80–1.210 | |
ARP Approach | Those who thought culture could still be maintained without FGM | 16.6 % (168) | 30 % (302) | <0.001 | 1.600 | 0.65–1.34 |
Those who thought girls can be prepared for marriage without undergoing FGM | 30.2 % (306) | 39.2 %(447) | <0.001 | 1.298 | 1.154–1.46 | |
Alternate IGA for FGM practitioners | Those who knew FGM practitioners that left practice and engaged in other IGA | 28.4 % (288) | - | - | - |