Skip to main content

Table 5 Meta-regression results of the impact of selected study-level variables on the meta-analysis estimates

From: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of food safety education interventions for consumers in developed countries

Meta-analysis sub-group/predictor

No. trials/studies

Average estimate of effect (95 % CI)

Adjusted R2a

RCT-behaviour-SMD

10/10

  

 Dose (>1 vs. 1 exposure)

 

0.68 (0.03, 1.33)

44.6 %

UBA-knowledge-RR

22/20

  

 Document type (other vs. journal)

 

2.01 (1.18, 3.43)

19.3 %

UBA-behaviour-RR

20/17

  

 Target population engaged in intervention (yes vs. no)

 

1.47 (1.02, 2.11)

27.4 %

  1. RCT randomized controlled trials, UBA uncontrolled before-and-after studies, SMD standardized mean difference (Hedges’ g), RR relative risk, CI confidence interval
  2. aAdjusted R2 refers to the proportion of between-study variance accounted for by the model