Skip to main content

Table 3 Contraceptive sales negative binomial regression results by study group and time

From: Impact of a passive social marketing intervention in community pharmacies on oral contraceptive and condom sales: a quasi-experimental study

 

Estimate

SE

LB

UB

t

P value

Condoms

      

intervention (vs. comparison)

−1.43

0.73

−2.87

0.01

−1.96

0.051

time 2 (vs. 1)

−0.05

0.07

−0.20

0.09

−0.74

0.461

time 3 (vs. 1)

−0.46

0.07

−0.61

−0.32

−6.42

<.001

time 3 (vs. 2)

−0.41

0.07

−0.55

−0.27

−5.69

<.001

intervention * time 2 (vs. 1)

0.16

0.14

−0.13

0.44

1.08

0.283

intervention * time 3 (vs. 1)

0.50

0.14

0.21

0.78

3.42

<.001

intervention * time 3 (vs. 2)

0.34

0.14

0.06

0.62

2.35

0.020

Oral Contraceptives

      

intervention (vs. comparison)

−0.74

0.22

−1.17

−0.32

−3.44

<.001

time 2 (vs. 1)

−0.04

0.04

−0.11

0.04

−0.91

0.363

time 3 (vs. 1)

0.01

0.04

−0.07

0.09

0.02

0.842

time 3 (vs. 2)

0.04

0.04

−0.03

0.12

1.11

0.268

intervention * time 2 (vs. 1)

0.06

0.08

−0.10

0.21

0.73

0.465

intervention * time 3 (vs. 1)

0.03

0.08

−0.12

0.19

0.40

0.693

intervention * time 3 (vs. 2)

−0.03

0.08

−0.18

0.13

−0.34

0.737

  1. Main effect and interaction estimates and p values are computed with contrast tests in the regression.
  2. Interaction terms reference category is always control.
  3. LB = Lower Bound, UB = Upper Bound for a 95% Confidence Interval.