Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
22 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kerr |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
22 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
5 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Max Rutherford |
26 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes |
14 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kerr |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
14 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
26 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Max Rutherford |
27 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes |
26 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kerr |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
26 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
30 Dec 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
30 Dec 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-9-492 |
You can find further information about peer review here.