Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kerr |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 22 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 5 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Max Rutherford |
| 26 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes |
| 14 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kerr |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 14 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 26 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Max Rutherford |
| 27 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes |
| 26 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kerr |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 26 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 30 Dec 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 30 Dec 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-9-492 |
You can find further information about peer review here.