Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Apr 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Remington Nevin |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
24 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
16 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Bricknell |
2 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Linda McCauley |
2 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Holger Ursin |
13 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Remington Nevin |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
21 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Holger Ursin |
30 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Linda McCauley |
9 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Remington Nevin |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
14 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Linda McCauley |
20 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Bricknell |
20 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Holger Ursin |
20 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Remington Nevin |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
20 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
1 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Remington Nevin |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
1 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
8 Oct 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
8 Oct 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-9-376 |
You can find further information about peer review here.