Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Pignone |
13 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carlo Senore |
11 Apr 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Kimberly Engelman |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
11 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
11 Apr 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Kimberly Engelman |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Pignone |
28 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carlo Senore |
26 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Kimberly Engelman |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
26 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
11 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Kimberly Engelman |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
24 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Kimberly Engelman |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
24 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
25 Sep 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
25 Sep 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-9-363 |
You can find further information about peer review here.