Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Jan 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Apr 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Dunstan |
20 Apr 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Helen Kelsall |
31 May 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Tyler Smith |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
31 May 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Jul 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Helen Kelsall |
10 Jul 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Dunstan |
7 Sep 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Tyler Smith |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
7 Sep 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
8 Oct 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Dunstan |
26 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matthew Hotopf |
2 Jan 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Tyler Smith |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Jan 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
8 Jan 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Tyler Smith |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
8 Jan 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
22 Jan 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Tyler Smith |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
22 Jan 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
13 Feb 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Feb 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-8-60 |
You can find further information about peer review here.