Skip to main content

Table 3 Results from the multivariate analysis – adjusted for demographic, socio-economic and reproductive variables, North and South Gondar zones, northwest Ethiopia, 2007

From: Differentials of fertility in North and South Gondar zones, northwest Ethiopia: A comparative cross-sectional study

Explanatory variable

Fertility level

OR (adjusted)

95% C. I.

P-value

 

High

Low

 

Lower

Upper

 

Place of residence

     

< 0.001*

   Big towns

84

389

1.00

   

   Small towns

79

230

1.27

0.86

1.90

0.235

   Rural areas

848

794

2.79

2.01

3.87

< 0.001

Age at first marriage

     

< 0.001*

   < 15 years

635

553

1.00

   

15 – 19 years

353

638

0.65

0.53

0.80

< 0.001

20 and above

23

200

0.21

0.13

0.36

< 0.001

Current marital status

      

   Married

889

1088

1.62

1.20

2.19

0.002

   Others

122

325

1.00

   

Educational level

     

0.002

   No education

884

989

1.00

   

   Primary

104

214

0.92

0.67

1.27

0.613

   Secondary and above

23

210

0.37

0.21

0.64

< 0.001

Monthly household expenditure

     

< 0.001*

   ≤ 320 Eth Birr

256

556

1.00

   

321 – 500 Eth Birr

309

487

1.48

1.16

1.88

0.001

501 – 999 Eth Birr

327

292

3.39

2.60

4.43

< 0.001

   ≥ 1000 Eth Birr

119

78

6.97

4.54

10.71

< 0.001

Number of children who have died

     

< 0.001*

   none

513

1235

1.00

   

   1–2 children

382

166

4.31

3.42

5.42

< 0.001

   3 and above children

116

12

19.87

10.45

37.77

< 0.001

Knowledge of the respondent regarding the period of pregnancy

      

   Correct

92

274

1.00

   

   Wrong

919

1139

1.42

1.04

1.93

0.027

Attitude towards using contraceptives in the future

      

   Yes

552

860

1.00

   

   No

459

553

1.26

1.02

1.55

0.030

Total number of children born alive from the mother of the respondent

      

   1 – 4 children

150

321

1.00

   

   5 – 9 children

650

929

1.27

0.97

1.64

0.079

   10 and above

211

162

2.16

1.55

3.03

< 0.001

  1. * For variables having more than two categories, the overall significance is given by their corresponding P – values N.B. The combined contribution of the rest 12 variables was very minimal (LRT = 19.67, (df = 20), P > > 0.20). This justifies the dropping of these variables so as to have a more parsimonious model that works just as the full model.