Peer Review reports
From: The reliability of the twelve-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) under realistic assumptions
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Feb 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 Mar 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Yin-Bun Cheung |
| 13 Mar 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen McKenna |
| 27 Mar 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Per Bech |
| 10 Apr 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Hankins |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 Apr 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen McKenna |
| 15 Apr 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Yin-Bun Cheung |
| 30 Apr 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Per Bech |
| 4 Sep 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeremy Miles |
| 25 Sep 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Hankins |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 25 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 25 Sep 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Hankins |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 7 Oct 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeremy Miles |
| 9 Oct 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Hankins |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 14 Oct 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
| 14 Oct 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-8-355 |
You can find further information about peer review here.