Table 3 Correlation between characteristics of work organisation and WIF: bivariate analysis (hierarchy according to eta; +/- indicating positive/negative correlation)
characteristics of work organisation | Â | F | p | eta | eta2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
number of days gone to work despite own illness | + | 16.296 | < .001 | .386 | .146 |
planned vacations postponed (frequency) | + | 13.074 | < .001 | .291 | .085 |
staff shortage as presumed reasons for changes in duty roster | + | 23.098 | < .001 | .270 | .073 |
strain due to a lost weekend off | + | 10.413 | < .001 | .264 | .070 |
strain due to changes in duty roster ignoring personal requests | + | 9.335 | < .001 | .252 | .063 |
colleagues on vacation as presumed reasons for changes in duty roster | + | 14.230 | < .001 | .215 | .046 |
exemption from duty during training | + | 7.688 | .001 | .225 | .051 |
personal requests ignored at changes in duty roster (frequency) | + | 7.374 | .001 | .221 | .049 |
strain due to being called on duty out of a day off | + | 7.063 | .001 | .221 | .049 |
strain due to having to continue to work after shift | + | 6.144 | .002 | .205 | .042 |
competitive pressure in department | + | 4.072 | .003 | .232 | .054 |
colleagues on maternity/parental leave as presumed reasons for changes in duty roster | + | 8.776 | .003 | .171 | .029 |
general frequency changes in duty roster on short notice | + | 4.754 | .003 | .218 | .047 |
appreciation of work by superiors | - | 3.502 | .008 | .216 | .047 |
continue working after shift (frequency) | + | 3.922 | .021 | .164 | .027 |