Skip to main content

Table 5 Multivariable analysis: variables independently associated with SRHS

From: Factors associated with self-rated health status in university students: a cross-sectional study in three European countries

Variables

β

SE

95%-CI

Partial Eta-square

Gender

   

0.002

   Male

Ref

   

   Female

-0.20

0.11

(-0.41, 0.02)

 

Country

   

0.001

   Bulgaria

Ref

   

   Germany

-0.29

0.27

(-0.82, 0.24)

 

   Poland

-0.23

0.27

(-0.75, 0.30)

 

Sufficiency of incomea

0.05*

0.02

(0.01, 0.10)

0.004

Psychosomatic complaintsb

0.44***

0.06

(0.33, 0.55)

0.043

> 2 visits to a doctors in the last six months

0.028

   Yes

Ref

   

   No

-0.27***

0.04

(-0.36, -0.19)

 

Physical activityc

-0.09**

0.03

(-0.14, -0.03)

0.007

Well-beingd

-0.03***

0.01

(-0.05, -0.02)

0.011

Self-efficacye

-0.27***

0.08

(-0.42, -0.12)

0.009

Sense of coherencef

-0.06*

0.03

(-0.12, -0.01)

0.004

Well-being by

   

0.006

   Country (Bulgaria)

Ref

   

   Country (Germany)

-0.02*

0.01

(-0.04, -0.002)

 

   Country (Poland)

0.01

0.01

(-0.01, 0.03)

 

Well-being by

   

0.004

   Gender (Male)

Ref

   

   Gender (Female)

0.02*

0.01

(0.003, 0.03)

 

Self-efficacy by

   

0.007

   Country (Bulgaria)

Ref

   

   Country (Germany)

0.30**

0.10

(0.11, 0.50)

 

   Country (Poland)

0.20

0.11

(-0.01, 0.41)

 
  1. †Positive coefficients β indicate decrease in health on the 5 point scale; in contrary negative coefficients indicate a better SRHS; Ref: reference category; a per unit of the 4 point scale from 1 = "totally sufficient" to 4 = "not sufficient at all"; b1 = "never" to 4 = "very often"; c1 = "less then once" to 3 = "at least 3 times"; d0 = "lowest possible well-being" to 25 = "highest possible well-being"; e1 = "low" to 5 = "high"; f1 = "very low" to 7 = "very high"; Significance of Wald test for the coefficient = 0: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001