Skip to main content

Table 2 Logistica and linearb regression to predict reasons for not using smoking cessation aids from demographic, smoking behaviour, motivational, and health-related variables

From: Reasons for not using smoking cessation aids

Prediction variables

Scale "Social and environmental barriers"

OR (CI 95%)

Scale "SCA unnecessary"

β-weight

 

univariate

multivariable

univariate

multivariable

demographic variables

    

   gender

    

malec

    

female

.559 (.371–.843)

.620 (.376–1.020)

-.019

-d

   age

1.004 (.989–1.019)

-

-.065

-

   educational level

    

< 10 yearsc

    

= 10 years

.382 (.219–.668)

.500 (.267–.936)

-.013

 

> 10 years

.220 (.111–.434)

.297 (.139–.632)

-.012

-

   marital status

    

married/living with a partnerc

    

not married/not living with a partner

.783 (.486–1.262)

-

-.019

-

smoking behaviour variables

    

   cigarettes per day

1.048 (1.015–1.082)

1.015 (.969–1.063)

.071

-

   FTND-Scoree

1.274 (1.098–1.477)

1.206 (.992–1.466)

.041

-

   age at onset

    

< 16 yearsc

    

16–18 years

1.219 (.758–1.959)

 

.012

 

> 18 years

1.091 (.613–1.942)

-

-.070

-

   quit attempts within the last 12 months

    

0c

    

1

1.379 (.780–2.438)

 

.011

 

2–5

1.528 (.852–2.742)

 

.057

 

>5

1.051 (.389–2.839)

-

.016

-

   smoking intensity

1.012 (1.003–1.021)

1.001 (.990–1.013)

.076

-

motivational variables

    

   intention to quit within the next six months

    

noc

    

yes

1.583 (1.013–2.473)

2.008 (1.207–3.338)

.121**

.113**

   pros of non-smoking

1.148 (.957–1.376)

-

.078

-

   self-efficacy

.885 (.696–1.125)

-

.063

-

health-related variables

    

   mental health

.927 (.684–1.257)

-

-.083*

-.073

   general health

.989 (.976–1.001)

-

.022

-

  1. All analyses were adjusted for study membership (population-based vs. general practice patient sample) as well as study group membership (intervention vs. control condition).
  2. a Scale „Social and environmental barriers", due to substantial non-normality the scale was dichotomised using 0 = no agreement, 1 = at least minimal agreement
  3. b Scale "SCA unnecessary"
  4. c Reference category
  5. d Not sufficient for multivariable analysis
  6. e Because cigarettes per day were used as separate predictor, the FTND score was computed without cigarettes per day to avoid multi-collinearity
  7. * p < .05; ** p < .01