Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
4 May 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Paula Diehr |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Muennig |
6 Jul 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joshua Salomon |
26 Jul 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Paula Diehr |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
26 Jul 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
26 Jul 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Paula Diehr |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
26 Jul 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
2 Aug 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Muennig |
17 Nov 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Petticrew |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
19 Dec 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Paula Diehr |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
19 Dec 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
11 Feb 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Muennig |
8 Mar 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Petticrew |
21 Mar 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Paula Diehr |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
21 Mar 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
26 Mar 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Muennig |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
Publishing | ||
5 Apr 2007 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Apr 2007 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-7-52 |
You can find further information about peer review here.