Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
10 Nov 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Rheeder |
15 Nov 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kathryn Rose |
16 Nov 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mostafa Zaman |
23 Nov 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nigel Unwin |
19 Jan 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Margaret Thorogood |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
19 Jan 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
23 Feb 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Margaret Thorogood |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Feb 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
5 Mar 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kathryn Rose |
9 Mar 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Rheeder |
9 Mar 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mostafa Zaman |
23 Apr 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nigel Unwin |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
5 Jun 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Margaret Thorogood |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
5 Jun 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
6 Jul 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kathryn Rose |
8 Oct 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Rheeder |
19 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Margaret Thorogood |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
19 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
8 Nov 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Margaret Thorogood |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
8 Nov 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
13 Nov 2007 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Nov 2007 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-7-326 |
You can find further information about peer review here.