Skip to main content

Table 4 Agreement between Audit and Questionnaire findings for health promotion delivered

From: A comparison of patients' perceptions and an audit of health promotion practice within a UK hospital

 

Health Promotion Delivery Identified

Kappa statistic (95% CI) Strength of agreement

Total agreement

False positive (95% CI)

False negative (95% CI)

SMOKING

       

(based on identified need)*

Audit

      

Questionnaire

Yes

No

Totals

    

Yes

7

6

13

NS

65%

61.5%

24%

No

8

19

27

  

(NA)

(9–45%)

Totals

15

25

40

    

ALCOHOL

       

(based on identified need)*

Audit

      

Questionnaire

Yes

No

Totals

    

Yes

6

2

8

0.50 (0.13 – 0.88)

77.8%

40.0%

11.8%

No

4

15

19

Moderate

 

(NA)

(NA)

Totals

10

17

27

    

DIET

       
 

Audit

      

Questionnaire

Yes

No

Totals

    

Yes

4

25

29

NS

79.8%

71.4%

15.7%

No

10

134

144

  

(NA)

(10–22%)

Totals

14

159

173

    

EXERCISE

       
 

Audit

      

Questionnaire

Yes

No

Totals

    

Yes

4

29

33

0.17 (0.07 – 0.26)

82.6%

20.0%

17.4%

No

1

138

139

Poor

 

(NA)

(12–24%)

Totals

5

167

172

    
  1. * Identified need determined by audit findings as opposed to questionnaire findings. NS: P value for Kappa statistic was not significant, indicating that agreement was not different from chance. NA: 95% CI not applicable as sample size too small.
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us