Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 6 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Amber Louie |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 2 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Töres Theorell |
| 9 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cameron Stark |
| 10 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gustavo Turecki |
| 31 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Aleck Ostry |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 31 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 2 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gustavo Turecki |
| 15 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cameron Stark |
| 3 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Aleck Ostry |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 3 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 13 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Aleck Ostry |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 13 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 27 Mar 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 27 Mar 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-6-77 |
You can find further information about peer review here.