Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Jul 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
17 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Candotti |
22 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Richens |
25 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maria Marcedes Avila |
22 Sep 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giovanni Rezza |
13 Oct 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Mecky Matee |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Candotti |
9 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Richens |
10 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giovanni Rezza |
19 Nov 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Mecky Matee |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
19 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Nov 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Mecky Matee |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
29 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Mecky Matee |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
4 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
4 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Mecky Matee |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
4 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
5 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Mecky Matee |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
5 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
30 Jan 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
30 Jan 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-6-21 |
You can find further information about peer review here.