Skip to main content

Table 4 Associations between attribution and types of exposure and background characteristics in exposed police officers with long-term physical complaints

From: Attribution of physical complaints to the air disaster in Amsterdam by exposed rescue workers: an epidemiological study using historic cohorts

 

Prevalence (column %)

Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)

 

Attribution†(n = 235)

No attribution† (n = 310)

Univariate analysis‡

Multivariate analysis§

Type of exposure:

    

Rescuing people

21

10

2.4 (1.5–3.9)***

1.6 (0.96–2.7)

Identification and recovery of or search for victims and human remains

12

8

1.7 (0.95–3.0)

2.2 (1.1–4.3)**

Clean-up of disaster site

7

3

2.8 (1.2–6.6)*

2.8 (1.1–7.0)*

Security and surveillance of disaster area

83

75

1.7 (1.1–2.5)*

1.8 (1.1–3.0)*

Supporting injured victims and workers

31

22

1.6 (1.1–2.4)*

-

Witnessed immediate disaster scene

83

70

2.1 (1.4–3.2)***

1.8 (1.1–3.0)*

Close one affected by disaster

11

4

2.8 (1.4–5.7)**

3.1 (1.5–6.5)**

Perceived severity disaster

    

- not bad

3

10

0.20 (0.08–0.48)***

0.23 (0.09–0.57)**

- quite bad

9

10

0.57 (0.29–1.1)

0.64 (0.32–1.3)

- terrible

62

61

0.70 (0.46–1.1)

0.73 (0.47–1.1)

- worst thing ever

26

18

Reference

Reference

Background characteristics:

    

Age (young)

50

52

0.93 (0.66–1.3)

-

Education

    

- high

21

21

Reference

-

- intermediate

49

56

0.87 (0.56–1.3)

-

- low

22

18

1.2 (0.70–2.0)

-

Sex (male)

91

85

1.9 (1.0–3.2)*

-

  1. †Attribution (little through a very strong relationship) versus no attribution (no relationship between physical complaints and the air disaster in Amsterdam and its aftermath). ‡Number of police officers included in the univariate analyses ranged from 536 to 545 due to occasional missing values. §The final multivariate model was based on 529 police officers and includes only those independent variables with P ≤ 0.10. *P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.