Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Hamid Reza Baradaran |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
4 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
8 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Hamid Reza Baradaran |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
10 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Heller |
16 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Gulliford |
11 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Hamid Reza Baradaran |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
11 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Hamid Reza Baradaran |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
17 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Gulliford |
25 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Hamid Reza Baradaran |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
25 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
28 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Hamid Reza Baradaran |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
28 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
9 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Hamid Reza Baradaran |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
9 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
12 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Hamid Reza Baradaran |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
12 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
18 May 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
18 May 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-6-134 |
You can find further information about peer review here.