Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
14 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
18 Nov 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Takeo Nakayama |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
18 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
23 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - philippe Hujoel |
6 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Takeo Nakayama |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
20 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - philippe Hujoel |
16 Mar 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alexandra Budinsky |
28 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Takeo Nakayama |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
28 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Takeo Nakayama |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
8 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Takeo Nakayama |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
8 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
14 May 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
14 May 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-6-131 |
You can find further information about peer review here.