Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Aug 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
23 Aug 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Costanza |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
23 Aug 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
6 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wasim Maziak |
5 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Hewson |
10 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Costanza |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
18 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wasim Maziak |
6 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Hewson |
20 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Costanza |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
11 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Hewson |
12 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Costanza |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
12 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
29 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Costanza |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
29 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
12 May 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
12 May 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-6-130 |
You can find further information about peer review here.