Table 2 Ordinal logistic regression models for associations between indicators of familial social position and poor health. Separate models for each health variable, adjusted for sex and age
HEALTH INDICATOR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRATIFICATION INDICATOR | Long-standing illness | Overweight | Use of mental health services | Poor self-rated health | Weekly health complaints |
Cumulative odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals2) | |||||
MODEL 11) | |||||
Father's SES | |||||
Upper white collar | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) |
Entrepreneur | 1.0 (0.7–1.2) | 1.8 (1.4–2.3) | 0.7 (0.4–1.0) | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | 1.1 (0.9–1.2) |
Lower white collar | 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | 1.3 (1.0–1.7) | 1.0 (0.7–1.4) | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | 1.0 (0.9–1.2) |
Blue collar/Other | 0.9 (0.7–1.1) | 1.8 (1.4–2.2) | 1.4 (1.0–1.8) | 1.2 (1.1–1.4) | 1.1 (0.9–1.2) |
Parent's education | |||||
Either has high level | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) |
Either has middle level | 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | 1.6 (1.2–2.1) | 1.2 (0.9–1.6) | 1.2 (1.1–1.4) | 1.0 (0.9–1.1) |
Both have low level | 1.4 (1.0–1.8) | 2.1 (1.6–2.8) | 1.5 (1.0–2.1) | 1.4 (1.2–1.7) | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) |
Parent's labour market position | |||||
Both gainfully employed | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) |
At most one gainfully employed | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | 1.4 (1.1–1.6) | 1.9 (1.5–2.3) | 1.4 (1.2–1.5) | 1.2 (1.1–1.3) |
MODEL 2 3)4) | |||||
Father's SES | . . | NS | NS | . . | |
Higher | 1.0 (ref) | ||||
Blue collar/Other | 1.3 (1.0–1.6) | ||||
Parent's education | . . | . . | |||
Either has high level | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
Either has middle level | 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | 1.6 (1.3–2.6) | 1.3 (1.1–1.5) | ||
Both have low level | 1.4 (1.0–1.8) | 2.0 (1.5–2.8) | 1.3 (1.1–1.6) | ||
Parent's labour market position | . . | ||||
Both gainfully employed | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | |
At most one gainfully employed | 1.3 (1.0–1.5) | 1.8 (1.4–2.2) | 1.3 (1.2–1.5) | 1.2 (1.1–1.3) | |