Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 Nov 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
20 Dec 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Claude Pichard |
23 Dec 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronenn Roubenoff |
11 Feb 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Obisesan |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
11 Feb 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
18 Feb 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Obisesan |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
18 Feb 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
22 Feb 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Claude Pichard |
1 Mar 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronenn Roubenoff |
11 Apr 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Obisesan |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Apr 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
19 Apr 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
19 Apr 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-5-41 |
You can find further information about peer review here.