Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Oct 2002 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Oct 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kuruvilla |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Oct 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
18 Nov 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Victor Kiri |
21 Nov 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rajeev Gupta |
15 Dec 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kuruvilla |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
15 Dec 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
15 Dec 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kuruvilla |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
15 Dec 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
31 Dec 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rajeev Gupta |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Publishing | ||
6 Jan 2003 | Editorially accepted | |
6 Jan 2003 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-3-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.