Skip to main content

Table 2 Reasons for accepting or rejecting coroners’ recommendations

From: What happens to coroners’ recommendations for improving public health and safety? Organisational responses under a mandatory response regime in Victoria, Australia

 

Rated as important or very important

Reasons for accepting recommendations (n = 60)

n

%

Prevention of future injury or death

56

93%

Reputational implications of not acting on recommendations

37

62%

Knowing the response was mandatory and posted online

31

52%

Legal implications of not acting on coroners’ recommendations

25

42%

Knowing the recommendation was posted online

22

37%

Reasons for rejecting recommendations (n = 45)

  

Recommendation not logistically viable

18

40%

Recommendation not relevant to business/operations

16

36%

Recommendation not economically viable

11

24%

Recommendation not clear

3

6%