Skip to main content

Table 2 Correlation matrix among indicators

From: The influence of locus of control on self-rated health in context of chronic disease: a structural equation modeling approach in a cross sectional study

 

Min

Max

Std-Dev

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1. Gender

1

2

.50

       

2. Age

22

89

9.52

.06

      

3. Education level

1

3

.84

-.09

-.27**

     

4. Internal MHLCa

6

36

5.37

-.16**

-.05

-.03

    

5. Chance MHLCa

6

33

4.59

.02

.13**

-.28**

.17**

   

6. Powerful others MHLCa

7

36

5.26

-.22**

.24**

-.11*

.22**

.22**

  

7. Disease burden

0

9

1.60

.05

.06

-.02

-.13**

.14**

.02

 

8. Self-rated health

1

5

.77

.00

-.09

.10*

.22**

-.18**

-.14**

-.36**

  1. *Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.
  2. **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.
  3. aMultidimensional health locus of control in index-form, ranging from 6 to 36.
  4. Maximum (max), minimum (min), standard deviations (Std-Dev) and correlations indicated. The matrix has been calculated with Spearman’s correlation coefficient. An index from 6 to 36 was used for each dimension of health locus of control.