Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
13 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Nina Sproeber |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
25 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Danilo Baltieri |
3 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kate Walsh |
5 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - anne-laure simonnot |
2 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Nina Sproeber |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
6 Dec 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Danilo Baltieri |
21 Dec 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kate Walsh |
3 Feb 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Nina Sproeber |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
3 Feb 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
20 Feb 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kate Walsh |
17 Mar 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Nina Sproeber |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
17 Mar 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
18 Mar 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Mar 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-282 |
You can find further information about peer review here.