Skip to main content

Table 4 Contingency tables and logistic regression results for the stakeholder group association with response rates

From: The use of a modified Delphi approach to engage stakeholders in zoonotic disease research priority setting

Rounds and stakeholder groups Response      
  Yes No b SE (b) Odds ratio 95% CI p-value a
Round 1        <0.001
 Policy developers/implementers 33 29 0.00 - 1.00 - -
 Horse industry representatives 25 99 -1.51 0.34 0.22 0.11, 0.43 -
 Researchers 26 8 1.05 0.48 2.86 1.16, 7.65 -
 Horse health care providers 9 11 -0.33 0.52 0.72 0.26, 1.98 -
 Wildlife health managers 8 7 0.0043 0.58 1.00 0.32, 3.19 -
Round 2        0.034
 Policy developers/implementers 27 6 0.00 - 1.00 - -
 Horse industry representatives 11 14 -1.75 0.61 0.18 0.050, 0.55 -
 Researchers 19 7 -0.51 0.63 0.60 0.17, 2.09 -
 Horse health care providers 5 4 -1.28 0.81 0.28 0.055, 1.40 -
 Wildlife health managers 6 2 -0.41 0.93 0.67 0.12, 5.30 -
Overall        <0.001
 Policy developers/implementers 27 35 0.00 - 1.00 -  
 Horse industry representatives 11 113 -2.07 0.41 0.13 0.055, 0.27  
 Researchers 19 15 0.50 0.43 1.64 0.71, 3.86  
 Horse health care providers 5 15 -0.84 0.58 0.43 0.13, 1.27  
 Wildlife health managers 6 9 -0.15 0.59 0.86 0.26, 2.70  
  1. a p-values based on likelihood ratio Chi-square test of significance.