Key findings: | |
1. | The considerable challenges of engaging with this audience and of frequent organisational change should not be underestimated |
2. | The IPB design methodology produced a tool aiding CC staff to deliver fire safety messages which: |
• was accessible to a broad range of staff | |
• was adaptable to different audiences and simple to use | |
• was a source of useful legitimate evidence | |
• motivated staff to have a go | |
• inspired future fire safety activity | |
• generated parental discussion and interest | |
• and initiated parental behaviour change | |
3. | While the IPB alone could not overcome all the challenges to implementation in this context combining it with external facilitation was extremely successful in improving: |
• Staff engagement | |
• Adaptability and flexibility and in mitigating effects of: | |
• Staff changes | |
• Lack of other agency support | |
• Conflicting priorities and targets | |
Implications for policy practice and research: | |
1. | Future children’s centre injury prevention interventions need to address the difficulties posed by organisational change and audience engagement. |
2. | Their design should ensure conditions for successful implementation are promoted through incorporating contextual knowledge and facilitation. |
3. | They should provide supporting evidence of local need and be accompanied by policy directives to enable CC staff to prioritise them. |
4. | Facilitation should include: |
• Internal facilitation: A named member of staff who is responsible for leading this strand of work and monitoring the impact. | |
• External facilitation: possibly drawing on the expertise of local injury prevention teams; especially the local FRS to answer queries, share concerns and raise confidence levels. | |
• Consistent involvement of external agencies including local Fire and Rescue Services is also important. | |
5. | IPBs are a potentially promising intervention for use by children’s centres, but they require evaluation in terms of safety behaviours and injury outcomes. |
6. | Possibilities for expanding the methodology for IPB development to other public health areas should be explored through further research |
7. | Further changes in CCs organisation, funding, and priorities should consider the impact this has on effective delivery of services. |