Skip to main content

Table 1 Recommendation grading (according to the "Guide d’analyse de la littérature et gradation des recommandations" - Literature analysis and recommendation grading guide, HAS, January 2000)

From: Medical follow-up for workers exposed to bladder carcinogens: the French evidence-based and pragmatic statement

Level of scientific proof provided by the literature (for clinical studies)

Recommendation grading

Level 1

 

High-power randomised comparative studies

A

Meta-analysis of randomised comparative studies

Scientific proof established

Decision analysis based on well-conducted studies

 

Level 2

 

Low-power randomised comparative studies

B

Well-conducted non-randomised comparative studies

Scientific proof presumed

Level 3

 

Case–control studies

 
 

C

Level 4

Low level of proof

Comparative studies with major bias

 

Retrospective studies

 

Case series