Table 3 Number of references to transferability hypotheses by the various categories of PRALIMAP participants
Number of references* to hypotheses by the interviewees | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Sponsor (N = 5) | Intermediary participant (N = 2) | Field participant (N = 16) | |
Hypotheses | |||
Population characteristics | |||
1. People’s perceptions of their own health needs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2. People’s representations of health | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3. Acceptability of the intervention | 5 | 1 | 10 |
4. Perception regarding the control over their behaviour | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5. Relationship with norms | 0 | 0 | 1 |
6. Interest in an intervention/motivation | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Interest in an intervention/adherence behaviour | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7. Experience and history | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Collective experience and history of a group | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8. Climate of trust (intervention’s providers/beneficiaries) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
9. Population’s participation in the action/individuals’ adherence | 0 | 0 | 0 |
10. Population’s participation in the intervention/result | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11. Population’s adherence/result | 0 | 0 | 0 |
12. 1–7 influences the implementation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NH. Playful dimension | 6 | 1 | 7 |
Implementation characteristics | |||
13. Stakeholder’s skills | 37 | 26 | 65 |
Stakeholder’s perception | 23 | 15 | 48 |
Acceptance of the intervention by stakeholders | 15 | 10 | 18 |
Procedures for mobilizing stakeholders | 54 | 28 | 104 |
14. Support for transfer adaptation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Support during transfer implementation | 15 | 11 | 54 |
15. Intervention modalities | 109 | 55 | 205 |
16. Implementation resources | 11 | 2 | 25 |
Resource accessibility | 4 | 0 | 2 |
17. Background and implementation | 5 | 1 | 3 |
Background and partnerships | 7 | 6 | 3 |
18. Partnerships and implementation | 23 | 15 | 19 |
19. Intervention’s implementation/results | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NH. Team stability | 6 | 9 | 11 |
Environmental characteristics | |||
20. Institutional environment and implementation | 15 | 2 | 5 |
Institutional environment and resources | 5 | 1 | 0 |
Institutional environment and partnerships | 2 | 0 | 0 |