Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality assessment of effect estimates of financial incentives on coverage of breastfeeding practices

From: Financial incentives and coverage of child health interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Intervention

No. of studies

Design

Limitations

Consistency

Generalizability to population of interest

Conditionalities related to outcome (no. of studies)

Overall quality of evidence

Mean difference (95% CI)

Receiving colostrum

Conditional microcredit

2

Cluster RCT /Cohort

Analysis of cRCT does not account for clustering

Consistent and both studies show benefit

Bolivia and Ghana

Health and nutrition education (2)

Low

0.22 (0.08; 0.35)

Early initiation of breastfeeding

Conditional microcredit

1

Cluster RCT

Single study. Analysis of cRCT does not account for clustering

-

Bolivia

Health and nutrition education (1)

Low

0.17 (0.01; 0.33)

Exclusive breastfeeding

Conditional microcredit

1

Cluster RCT

Single study. Analysis of cRCT does not account for clustering

-

Bolivia

Health and nutrition education (1)

Low

0.20 (0.03; 0.37)

Duration of exclusive breastfeeding

Conditional microcredit

1

Cohort

Only one study

-

Ghana

Health and nutrition education (1)

Low

11.49 (1.69; 21.29)

Breastfeeding among children < 2 years

Unconditional microcredit

2

Cohort

Type of breastfeeding (e.g. exclusive, predominant) is not specified

Consistent, both studies show negative effect

Ecuador and Honduras

-

Low

-0.06 (-0.16; 0.04)

Conditional microcredit

2

Cohort

Type of breastfeeding (e.g. exclusive, predominant) is not specified

Inconsistent

Ecuador and Honduras

Health and nutrition education (2)

Low

-0.01 (-0.03; 0.02)