Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 1 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Toni Liechty |
| 20 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kyle De Young |
| 28 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kelsie Forbush |
| 7 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jonathan Mond |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 7 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 5 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kyle De Young |
| 10 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kelsie Forbush |
| 28 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jonathan Mond |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 28 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 28 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kyle De Young |
| 14 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kelsie Forbush |
| 8 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Petra Graham |
| 16 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Jonathan Mond |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 16 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 9 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Petra Graham |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 25 Sep 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Oct 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-920 |
You can find further information about peer review here.