Table 4 Condom use (never-use = 0; occasional use = 1; consistent use = 2) by communication at previous data collection occasion and other predictors
Time | Predictors | n | OR (95% CI) | p< |
|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 – T2 | Site | .05 | ||
Dar es Salaam | 170 | 1.00 | - | |
Mankweng | 358 | 1.75 (1.11 - 2.76) | .05 | |
Cape Town | 490 | 1.83 (1.14 - 2.94) | .05 | |
Gender | .05 | |||
Male | 747 | 1.00 | ||
Female | 171 | 1.82 (1.03 - 3.24) | ||
Condom use at T1 | .001 | |||
Never-users | 218 | 1.00 | - | |
Occasional users | 368 | 5.84 (3.00 - 11.37) | .001 | |
Consistent users | 88 | 36.49 (14.40 - 92.42) | .001 | |
Sexually inactive | 344 | 6.35 (3.43 - 11.78) | .001 | |
Victims of violence at T2 | n.s. | |||
No | 615 | 1.00 | ||
Yes | 403 | 1.05 (.84 - 1.33) | ||
Age | - | 1.12 (1.03 - 1.21) | .05 | |
Access condoms at T2 | - | 1.28 (1.14 - 1.45) | .001 | |
SES at T2 | - | 1.14 (0.97 - 1.34) | n.s. | |
Communication at T1 | - | 1.22 (1.08 - 1.37) | .01 | |
Nagelkerke’s pseudo R2 =.313 | ||||
T1 –T3 | Site | .001 | ||
Dar es Salaam | 170 | 1.00 | - | |
Mankweng | 298 | 2.56 (1.67 - 3.91) | .001 | |
Cape Town | 379 | 2.55 (1.72 -.3.77 | .001 | |
Gender | .001 | |||
Male | 598 | 1.00 | ||
Female | 249 | 1.96 (1.40 - 2.75) | ||
Condom use at T1 | .001 | |||
Never-users | 149 | 1.00 | - | |
Occasional users | 249 | 3.20 (1.97 - 5.20) | .001 | |
Consistent users | 56 | 8.34 (4.12 - 16.85) | .001 | |
Sexually inactive | 393 | 3.30 (2.04 - 5.31) | .001 | |
Victims of violence at T3 | .n.s. | |||
No | 507 | 1.00 | ||
Yes | 340 | 1.02 (0.80 - 1.29) | ||
Age | - | 0.99 (.90 - 1.09) | n.s. | |
Access condoms at T3 | - | 1.38 (1.18 - 1.61) | .001 | |
SES at T3 | - | 1.34 (1.15 - 1.56) | .001 | |
Communication at T1 | - | 1.21 (1.04 - 1.41) | .05 | |
Nagelkerke’s pseudo R2 =.226 | ||||
T2 - T3 | Site | .001 | ||
Dar es Salaam | 202 | 1.00 | - | |
Mankweng | 296 | 2.71 (1.81 - 4.07) | .001 | |
Cape Town | 401 | 3.09 (2.10 - 4.55) | .001 | |
Gender | .001 | |||
Male | 643 | 1.00 | ||
Female | 256 | 1.79 (1.34 - 2.39) | ||
Condom use at T2 | .001 | |||
Never-users | 158 | 1.00 | - | |
Occasional users | 329 | 2.80 (1.75 – 4.46) | .001 | |
Consistent users | 78 | 15.73 (6.78 - 36.52) | .001 | |
Missing | 334 | 3.03 (1.70 - 5.41) | .001 | |
Victims of violence at T3 | n.s. | |||
No | 549 | 1.00 | ||
Yes | 350 | 1.22 (0.94 - 1.59) | n.s. | |
Age | - | 0.99 (0.91 – 1.07) | n.s. | |
Access condoms at T3 | - | 1.32 (1.14 - 1.53) | .001 | |
SES at T3 | - | 1.32 (1.24 - 1.53) | .001 | |
Communication at T2 | - | 1.20 (1.03 - 1.40) | .05 | |
Nagelkerke’s pseudo R2 =.275 | ||||